I'm not sure if this is true or not, but either way it certainly belies Hillary's claim that she's been fully vetted:
..Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.
But they show that the pattern of lies, deceit, fabrications and unethical behavior was established long ago – long before the Bosnia lie, and indeed, even before cattle futures, Travelgate and Whitewater – for the woman who is still asking us to make her president of the United States.
2 comments:
Although I am an Obama supporter and am currenty hugely disappointed with Hillary, I have my doubts about Zeifman based on some of his rantings re Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy. I would like to learn more about Mr. Zeifman before I fully buy in to his 1974 recollections, or, at least get some verification from some of the other players involved.
But that misses my point. It's irrelevant whether it's true or not. Her main claim to being a stronger general election candidate is that everybody alredy knows all her dirt. But given the recent Tuzla BS and now this, her claim to being fully vetted begins to look weak.
Post a Comment